Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Little rock, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Little rock, AR.
| Data | Flomaton | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,458 | 202,864 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $37,500 | $58,697 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Little rock
- The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- The median age in Little rock is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Little rock has a higher median income of $58,697, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flomaton at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Little rock.
- Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Little rock.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flomaton | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 41 |
| White | 58 | 44 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Little rock
- In Little rock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 38% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 44% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Flomaton.
- Little rock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- Both Flomaton and Little rock have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flomaton and Little rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flomaton | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Little rock
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.9% in Little rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 21.9% in Little rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 19.0% in Little rock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Flomaton at 13.7% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 39.0% in Little rock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Little rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flomaton | Little rock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (1,359) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 12.2% (24,667) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 7.3% (14,766) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 29.4% (59,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Little rock
- In Little rock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.