Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Lewiston, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Lewiston, ID.
| Data | Flomaton | Lewiston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,458 | 34,896 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $37,500 | $63,109 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Lewiston
- The population in Lewiston is higher at 34,896, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- The median age in Lewiston is higher at 39.8 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Lewiston has a higher median income of $63,109, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- In Lewiston, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Lewiston.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.1% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Lewiston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flomaton | Lewiston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 58 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Lewiston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 0% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lewiston at 89% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- In Lewiston, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Flomaton.
- Lewiston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lewiston at 5%, compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- In Lewiston, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flomaton | Lewiston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 36.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Lewiston
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.6% in Lewiston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 24.4% in Lewiston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 15.8% in Lewiston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lewiston at 18.4% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 36.2% in Lewiston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Lewiston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flomaton | Lewiston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (292) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 16.0% (5,600) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 9.3% (3,257) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 17.6% (6,140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Lewiston
- In Lewiston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 16.0% in Lewiston.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 9.3% in Lewiston.
- In Lewiston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.