Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Hydro, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Hydro, OK.
| Data | Flomaton | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,458 | 898 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $37,500 | $37,361 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Hydro
- In Flomaton, the population is higher at 1,458, compared to 898 in Hydro.
- The median age in Hydro is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher median income of $37,500 compared to $37,361 in Hydro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flomaton at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Hydro.
- Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Hydro.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.6% in Hydro.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Hydro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flomaton | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 1 |
| White | 58 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 1% in Hydro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hydro at 76% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- Both Flomaton and Hydro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Hydro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hydro at 10%, compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- In Hydro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flomaton | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Hydro
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.9% in Hydro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hydro at 25.9% versus 24.6% in Flomaton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 20.2% in Hydro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hydro at 14.5% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 40.6% in Hydro.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hydro at 34.0% compared to 19.0% in Flomaton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flomaton | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 27.6% (248) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 10.2% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 19.6% (176) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Hydro
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Flomaton and Hydro at 0.0%.
- In Hydro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 25.0% in Flomaton.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 10.2% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.