Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Crawford, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Crawford, NE.
| Data | Flomaton | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,458 | 838 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 52.1 years |
| Median Income | $37,500 | $54,167 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Crawford
- In Flomaton, the population is higher at 1,458, compared to 838 in Crawford.
- The median age in Crawford is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Crawford has a higher median income of $54,167, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Crawford.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flomaton | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 58 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Crawford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawford at 76% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- Both Flomaton and Crawford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Flomaton at 4% compared to 3% in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flomaton | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Crawford
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 18.9% in Crawford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 15.7% in Crawford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 40.3% in Crawford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Crawford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flomaton | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 30.2% (253) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 6.0% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 17.1% (143) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Crawford
- In Crawford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.2% compared to 25.0% in Flomaton.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- In Crawford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.