Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Corcoran, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Corcoran, CA.
| Data | Flomaton | Corcoran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,458 | 22,837 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 34.0 years |
| Median Income | $37,500 | $53,103 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 16.7 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Corcoran
- The population in Corcoran is higher at 22,837, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- The median age in Corcoran is higher at 34.0 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Corcoran has a higher median income of $53,103, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flomaton at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Corcoran.
- The poverty level is higher in Corcoran at 20%, compared to 15% in Flomaton.
- Corcoran has a higher unemployment rate at 16.7% compared to 5.2% in Flomaton.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Corcoran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flomaton | Corcoran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 10 |
| White | 58 | -8 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 74 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Corcoran
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 10% in Corcoran.
- Flomaton has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to -8% in Corcoran.
- In Corcoran, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Flomaton.
- Corcoran has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 74%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corcoran at 20%, compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- In Corcoran, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flomaton | Corcoran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.8% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Corcoran
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.5% in Corcoran.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 17.4% in Corcoran.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 22.0% in Corcoran.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Corcoran at 15.5% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 40.7% in Corcoran.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Corcoran.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flomaton | Corcoran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (343) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 16.3% (3,728) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 53.2% (12,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 2.7% (612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Corcoran
- In Corcoran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 16.3% in Corcoran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corcoran at 53.2%, compared to 19.1% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 2.7% in Corcoran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.