Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Avella, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Avella, PA.
| Data | Flomaton | Avella |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,458 | 798 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $37,500 | $61,806 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Avella
- In Flomaton, the population is higher at 1,458, compared to 798 in Avella.
- The median age in Avella is higher at 33.2 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Avella has a higher median income of $61,806, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flomaton at 35.0% compared to 28.0% in Avella.
- Flomaton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Avella.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Avella.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Avella provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flomaton | Avella |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 58 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Avella
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flomaton at 38% compared to 0% in Avella.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Avella at 96% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- Both Flomaton and Avella have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Flomaton and Avella at 0%.
- Both Flomaton and Avella have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flomaton and Avella at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flomaton | Avella |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Avella
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.5% in Avella.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 22.2% in Avella.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.1% compared to 19.0% in Avella.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Avella at 19.1% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 34.4% in Avella.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Avella at 27.0% compared to 19.0% in Flomaton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flomaton | Avella |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 26.6% (212) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 17.3% (138) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 7.5% (60) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Avella
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Flomaton and Avella at 0.0%.
- In Avella, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 25.0% in Flomaton.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 17.3% in Avella.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 7.5% in Avella.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.