Demographics details for Flint, MI vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flint, MI vs Trumann, AR.
Data | Flint | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Population | 79,854 | 7,305 |
Median Age | 36.1 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $35,451 | $37,618 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 32% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 10.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Flint vs Trumann
- In Flint, the population is higher at 79,854, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- The median age in Trumann is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 36.1 years in Flint.
- Trumann has a higher median income of $37,618, compared to $35,451 in Flint.
- In Trumann, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 20.0% in Flint.
- Flint has a higher poverty level at 32% compared to 13% in Trumann.
- The unemployment rate in Flint is higher at 10.4%, compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics Flint vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Flint | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Black | 58 | 5 |
White | 30 | 84 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flint vs Trumann
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flint at 58% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 30% in Flint.
- The Asian population is larger in Flint at 1% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Flint at 4% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 7% in Flint.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flint and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Flint | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.3% | 15.2% |
Depression | 25.6% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 29.5% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 51.7% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flint vs Trumann
- More residents in Flint report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 20.8% in Trumann.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 25.6% in Flint.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flint at 29.5% compared to 25.0% in Trumann.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Trumann at 14.4% compared to 14.0% in Flint.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flint at 51.7% compared to 44.6% in Trumann.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flint at 25.0% compared to 24.0% in Trumann.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Flint | Trumann |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (629) | 1.8% (135) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (16,121) | 25.9% (1,895) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (12,181) | 24.4% (1,780) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (6,616) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flint vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Flint.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 20.2% in Flint.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 15.3% in Flint.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flint hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.