Demographics details for Flint hill, VA vs Washington, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flint hill, VA vs Washington, KS.
| Data | Flint hill | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 319 | 5,501 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $39,044 | $59,432 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Flint hill vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 5,501, compared to 319 in Flint hill.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 28.0 years in Flint hill.
- Washington has a higher median income of $59,432, compared to $39,044 in Flint hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flint hill at 47.0% compared to 46.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 4% in Flint hill.
- The unemployment rate in Flint hill is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Flint hill vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flint hill | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 67 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flint hill vs Washington
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Flint hill and Washington at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 93% compared to 67% in Flint hill.
- In Washington, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Flint hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Flint hill at 26% compared to 4% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Flint hill at 7% compared to 2% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flint hill and Washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flint hill | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 42.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flint hill vs Washington
- More residents in Flint hill report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flint hill at 24.0% compared to 20.9% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 16.0% in Flint hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 20.4% compared to 18.5% in Flint hill.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 34.4% in Flint hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flint hill at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flint hill | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (45) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (64) | 24.9% (1,368) |
| Less than High School | 28.2% (90) | 9.0% (494) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (50) | 15.8% (869) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flint hill vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Flint hill.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 20.1% in Flint hill.
- More residents in Flint hill have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 9.0% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 15.7% in Flint hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.