Demographics details for Flint hill, VA vs Vancouver, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flint hill, VA vs Vancouver, WA.
Data | Flint hill | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
Population | 319 | 194,512 |
Median Age | 28.0 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $39,044 | $73,626 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Flint hill vs Vancouver
- The population in Vancouver is higher at 194,512, compared to 319 in Flint hill.
- The median age in Vancouver is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 28.0 years in Flint hill.
- Vancouver has a higher median income of $73,626, compared to $39,044 in Flint hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flint hill at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Vancouver.
- The poverty level is higher in Vancouver at 10%, compared to 4% in Flint hill.
- Vancouver has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Flint hill.
Demographics
Demographics Flint hill vs Vancouver provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Flint hill | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 67 | 65 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 26 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Flint hill vs Vancouver
- In Vancouver, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Flint hill.
- Flint hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 65% in Vancouver.
- In Vancouver, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Flint hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Flint hill at 26% compared to 15% in Vancouver.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Vancouver at 11%, compared to 7% in Flint hill.
- In Vancouver, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Flint hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Flint hill | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.5% |
Depression | 24.0% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 14.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 33.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flint hill vs Vancouver
- In Vancouver, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.5% in Flint hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Vancouver at 25.7% versus 24.0% in Flint hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flint hill at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in Vancouver.
- Binge drinking is more common in Flint hill at 18.5% compared to 17.7% in Vancouver.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flint hill at 34.4% compared to 33.1% in Vancouver.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flint hill at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Vancouver.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Flint hill | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (1,478) |
High School Diploma | 20.1% (64) | 13.9% (26,995) |
Less than High School | 28.2% (90) | 10.7% (20,890) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (50) | 21.2% (41,308) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flint hill vs Vancouver
- In Vancouver, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Flint hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flint hill hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 13.9% in Vancouver.
- More residents in Flint hill have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 10.7% in Vancouver.
- In Vancouver, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 15.7% in Flint hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.