Demographics details for Flint hill, VA vs Spanish fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Flint hill, VA vs Spanish fork, UT.

Data Flint hill Spanish fork
Population 319 44,102
Median Age 28.0 years 27.4 years
Median Income $39,044 $93,989
Married Families 47.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 4% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.8

Population Comparison: Flint hill vs Spanish fork

  • The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 319 in Flint hill.
  • Residents in Flint hill have a higher median age of 28.0 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $39,044 in Flint hill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Flint hill at 47.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
  • The poverty level is higher in Spanish fork at 6%, compared to 4% in Flint hill.
  • Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Flint hill.

Demographics

Demographics Flint hill vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Flint hill Spanish fork
Black Data is updating 1
White 67 80
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 26 12
Two or More Races 7 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Flint hill vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Flint hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 67% in Flint hill.
  • Both Flint hill and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Flint hill at 26% compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
  • Both Flint hill and Spanish fork have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flint hill and Spanish fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Flint hill Spanish fork
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 10.8%
Depression 24.0% 23.8%
Smoking 16.0% 7.7%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 8.3%
Obesity 34.4% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Flint hill vs Spanish fork

  • More residents in Flint hill report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Flint hill at 24.0% compared to 23.8% in Spanish fork.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Flint hill at 16.0% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Flint hill at 18.5% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Flint hill at 34.4% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Flint hill at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Flint hill Spanish fork
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (175)
High School Diploma 20.1% (64) 9.1% (4,010)
Less than High School 28.2% (90) 5.9% (2,583)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (50) 19.4% (8,546)

Education Levels Comparison: Flint hill vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Flint hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Flint hill hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents in Flint hill have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
  • In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 15.7% in Flint hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.