Demographics details for Flint hill, VA vs Crossett, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flint hill, VA vs Crossett, AR.
Data | Flint hill | Crossett |
---|---|---|
Population | 319 | 4,613 |
Median Age | 28.0 years | 43.6 years |
Median Income | $39,044 | $41,250 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Flint hill vs Crossett
- The population in Crossett is higher at 4,613, compared to 319 in Flint hill.
- The median age in Crossett is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 28.0 years in Flint hill.
- Crossett has a higher median income of $41,250, compared to $39,044 in Flint hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flint hill at 47.0% compared to 40.0% in Crossett.
- The poverty level is higher in Crossett at 19%, compared to 4% in Flint hill.
- Crossett has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Flint hill.
Demographics
Demographics Flint hill vs Crossett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Flint hill | Crossett |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 45 |
White | 67 | 51 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 26 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flint hill vs Crossett
- In Crossett, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 0% in Flint hill.
- Flint hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 51% in Crossett.
- Both Flint hill and Crossett have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Flint hill at 26% compared to 2% in Crossett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Flint hill at 7% compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flint hill and Crossett at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Flint hill | Crossett |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 16.1% |
Depression | 24.0% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 16.0% | 25.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 12.6% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 44.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flint hill vs Crossett
- In Crossett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 16.5% in Flint hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crossett at 26.2% versus 24.0% in Flint hill.
- Crossett has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 16.0% in Flint hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Flint hill at 18.5% compared to 12.6% in Crossett.
- Crossett has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 34.4% in Flint hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crossett at 27.0% compared to 15.0% in Flint hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Flint hill | Crossett |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (40) |
High School Diploma | 20.1% (64) | 25.8% (1,191) |
Less than High School | 28.2% (90) | 14.2% (653) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (50) | 14.9% (687) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flint hill vs Crossett
- In Crossett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Flint hill.
- In Crossett, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.8% compared to 20.1% in Flint hill.
- More residents in Flint hill have less than a high school education at 28.2% compared to 14.2% in Crossett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flint hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 14.9% in Crossett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.