Demographics details for Flemington, NJ vs Woodbury, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flemington, NJ vs Woodbury, TN.
| Data | Flemington | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,906 | 2,804 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $85,306 | $51,528 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Flemington vs Woodbury
- In Flemington, the population is higher at 4,906, compared to 2,804 in Woodbury.
- The median age in Woodbury is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 32.4 years in Flemington.
- Flemington has a higher median income of $85,306 compared to $51,528 in Woodbury.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flemington at 41.0% compared to 25.0% in Woodbury.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodbury at 10%, compared to 5% in Flemington.
- The unemployment rate in Flemington is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Woodbury.
Demographics
Demographics Flemington vs Woodbury provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flemington | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 58 | 89 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flemington vs Woodbury
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flemington at 6% compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodbury at 89% compared to 58% in Flemington.
- The Asian population is larger in Flemington at 5% compared to 0% in Woodbury.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Flemington at 25% compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Flemington at 6% compared to 3% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flemington and Woodbury at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flemington | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 30.2% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 23.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flemington vs Woodbury
- In Woodbury, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Flemington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodbury at 30.2% versus 23.8% in Flemington.
- Woodbury has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 18.6% in Flemington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Flemington at 16.8% compared to 15.6% in Woodbury.
- Woodbury has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 34.8% in Flemington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodbury at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Flemington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flemington | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (128) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (825) | 28.8% (807) |
| Less than High School | 23.5% (1,155) | 17.9% (502) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (1,117) | 9.7% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flemington vs Woodbury
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.7% in Woodbury.
- In Woodbury, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.8% compared to 16.8% in Flemington.
- More residents in Flemington have less than a high school education at 23.5% compared to 17.9% in Woodbury.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 9.7% in Woodbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.