Demographics details for Flemington, NJ vs Victorville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flemington, NJ vs Victorville, CA.
Data | Flemington | Victorville |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,906 | 137,221 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 31.8 years |
Median Income | $85,306 | $65,746 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 7.5 |
Population Comparison: Flemington vs Victorville
- The population in Victorville is higher at 137,221, compared to 4,906 in Flemington.
- Residents in Flemington have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 31.8 years in Victorville.
- Flemington has a higher median income of $85,306 compared to $65,746 in Victorville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flemington at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Victorville.
- The poverty level is higher in Victorville at 12%, compared to 5% in Flemington.
- Victorville has a higher unemployment rate at 7.5% compared to 3.5% in Flemington.
Demographics
Demographics Flemington vs Victorville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Flemington | Victorville |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 17 |
White | 58 | 4 |
Asian | 5 | 4 |
Hispanic | 25 | 54 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 19 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Flemington vs Victorville
- In Victorville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Flemington.
- Flemington has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 4% in Victorville.
- The Asian population is larger in Flemington at 5% compared to 4% in Victorville.
- Victorville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 25% in Flemington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Victorville at 19%, compared to 6% in Flemington.
- In Victorville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Flemington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Flemington | Victorville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 14.4% |
Depression | 23.8% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 34.8% | 41.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flemington vs Victorville
- In Victorville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.2% in Flemington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flemington at 23.8% compared to 19.0% in Victorville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flemington at 18.6% compared to 16.2% in Victorville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Flemington at 16.8% compared to 14.8% in Victorville.
- Victorville has higher obesity rates at 41.3% compared to 34.8% in Flemington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Victorville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Flemington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Flemington | Victorville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (128) | 1.7% (2,334) |
High School Diploma | 16.8% (825) | 15.1% (20,711) |
Less than High School | 23.5% (1,155) | 24.1% (33,076) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (1,117) | 6.6% (9,125) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flemington vs Victorville
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.7% in Victorville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 15.1% in Victorville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Victorville at 24.1%, compared to 23.5% in Flemington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.