Demographics details for Flemington, NJ vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flemington, NJ vs Federal way, WA.
| Data | Flemington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,906 | 97,863 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $85,306 | $80,360 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Flemington vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 4,906 in Flemington.
- The median age in Federal way is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 32.4 years in Flemington.
- Flemington has a higher median income of $85,306 compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flemington at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
- The poverty level is higher in Federal way at 9%, compared to 5% in Flemington.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.5% in Flemington.
Demographics
Demographics Flemington vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flemington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 17 |
| White | 58 | 34 |
| Asian | 5 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Flemington vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Flemington.
- Flemington has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 5% in Flemington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Flemington at 25% compared to 19% in Federal way.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 6% in Flemington.
- In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Flemington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flemington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 34.8% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flemington vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.2% in Flemington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 23.8% in Flemington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flemington at 18.6% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
- Binge drinking is more common in Flemington at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flemington at 34.8% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Flemington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flemington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (128) | 1.8% (1,735) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (825) | 15.3% (15,003) |
| Less than High School | 23.5% (1,155) | 11.0% (10,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (1,117) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flemington vs Federal way
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.8% in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
- More residents in Flemington have less than a high school education at 23.5% compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flemington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.