Demographics details for Flemington, NJ vs Farmington hills, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Flemington, NJ vs Farmington hills, MI.

Data Flemington Farmington hills
Population 4,906 82,737
Median Age 32.4 years 41.6 years
Median Income $85,306 $101,728
Married Families 41.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.8

Population Comparison: Flemington vs Farmington hills

  • The population in Farmington hills is higher at 82,737, compared to 4,906 in Flemington.
  • The median age in Farmington hills is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 32.4 years in Flemington.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728, compared to $85,306 in Flemington.
  • In Farmington hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Flemington.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Flemington and Farmington hills at 5%.
  • The unemployment rate in Flemington is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Flemington vs Farmington hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Flemington Farmington hills
Black 6 18
White 58 59
Asian 5 15
Hispanic 25 2
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Flemington vs Farmington hills

  • In Farmington hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 6% in Flemington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington hills at 59% compared to 58% in Flemington.
  • In Farmington hills, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 5% in Flemington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Flemington at 25% compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • Both Flemington and Farmington hills have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flemington and Farmington hills at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Flemington Farmington hills
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 8.0%
Depression 23.8% 19.0%
Smoking 18.6% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 17.5%
Obesity 34.8% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Flemington vs Farmington hills

  • More residents in Flemington report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Flemington at 23.8% compared to 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Flemington at 18.6% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 16.8% in Flemington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Flemington at 34.8% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington hills at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Flemington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Flemington Farmington hills
No Schooling 2.6% (128) 0.6% (488)
High School Diploma 16.8% (825) 9.5% (7,900)
Less than High School 23.5% (1,155) 6.0% (4,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.8% (1,117) 42.2% (34,948)

Education Levels Comparison: Flemington vs Farmington hills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Flemington have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.6% in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Flemington hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents in Flemington have less than a high school education at 23.5% compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • In Farmington hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 22.8% in Flemington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.