Demographics details for Fleming island, FL vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fleming island, FL vs Palos park, IL.
| Data | Fleming island | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,810 | 4,792 |
| Median Age | 47.0 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $117,414 | $128,370 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fleming island vs Palos park
- In Fleming island, the population is higher at 29,810, compared to 4,792 in Palos park.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 47.0 years in Fleming island.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $117,414 in Fleming island.
- In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 57.0% in Fleming island.
- Fleming island has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Fleming island.
Demographics
Demographics Fleming island vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fleming island | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 3 |
| White | 75 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fleming island vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fleming island at 6% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palos park at 88% compared to 75% in Fleming island.
- The Asian population is larger in Fleming island at 2% compared to 1% in Palos park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fleming island at 10% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fleming island at 7% compared to 5% in Palos park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fleming island and Palos park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fleming island | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 31.2% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fleming island vs Palos park
- More residents in Fleming island report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fleming island at 19.8% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fleming island at 16.1% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 17.1% in Fleming island.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fleming island at 31.2% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fleming island at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fleming island | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (127) | 1.1% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (3,358) | 18.2% (870) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (1,017) | 6.0% (287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.9% (10,407) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fleming island vs Palos park
- In Palos park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Fleming island.
- In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 11.3% in Fleming island.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Palos park at 6.0%, compared to 3.4% in Fleming island.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 34.9% in Fleming island.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.