Demographics details for Fleming island, FL vs Gallatin, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fleming island, FL vs Gallatin, TN.

Data Fleming island Gallatin
Population 29,810 48,194
Median Age 47.0 years 37.8 years
Median Income $117,414 $68,548
Married Families 57.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.3

Population Comparison: Fleming island vs Gallatin

  • The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 29,810 in Fleming island.
  • Residents in Fleming island have a higher median age of 47.0 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
  • Fleming island has a higher median income of $117,414 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleming island at 57.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 5% in Fleming island.
  • Gallatin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 2.5% in Fleming island.

Demographics

Demographics Fleming island vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fleming island Gallatin
Black 6 15
White 75 67
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 10 9
Two or More Races 7 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fleming island vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 6% in Fleming island.
  • Fleming island has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
  • Both Fleming island and Gallatin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fleming island at 10% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
  • Both Fleming island and Gallatin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fleming island and Gallatin at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fleming island Gallatin
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 13.2%
Depression 19.8% 27.7%
Smoking 16.1% 20.8%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 14.7%
Obesity 31.2% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fleming island vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.3% in Fleming island.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 19.8% in Fleming island.
  • Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 16.1% in Fleming island.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fleming island at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
  • Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 31.2% in Fleming island.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fleming island and Gallatin at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fleming island Gallatin
No Schooling 0.4% (127) 1.2% (596)
High School Diploma 11.3% (3,358) 13.9% (6,695)
Less than High School 3.4% (1,017) 11.6% (5,600)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.9% (10,407) 19.6% (9,464)

Education Levels Comparison: Fleming island vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Fleming island.
  • In Gallatin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 11.3% in Fleming island.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 3.4% in Fleming island.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fleming island hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.