Demographics details for Fleming island, FL vs Freeport, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fleming island, FL vs Freeport, MN.
Data | Fleming island | Freeport |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,810 | 677 |
Median Age | 47.0 years | 29.9 years |
Median Income | $117,414 | $91,250 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fleming island vs Freeport
- In Fleming island, the population is higher at 29,810, compared to 677 in Freeport.
- Residents in Fleming island have a higher median age of 47.0 years compared to 29.9 years in Freeport.
- Fleming island has a higher median income of $117,414 compared to $91,250 in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleming island at 57.0% compared to 53.0% in Freeport.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fleming island and Freeport at 5%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fleming island and Freeport at 2.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Fleming island vs Freeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fleming island | Freeport |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 2 |
White | 75 | 82 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fleming island vs Freeport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fleming island at 6% compared to 2% in Freeport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeport at 82% compared to 75% in Fleming island.
- The Asian population is larger in Fleming island at 2% compared to 0% in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 10% in Fleming island.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fleming island at 7% compared to 4% in Freeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fleming island and Freeport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fleming island | Freeport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 9.3% |
Depression | 19.8% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 16.1% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 23.3% |
Obesity | 31.2% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fleming island vs Freeport
- More residents in Fleming island report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 15.0% in Freeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Freeport at 23.7% versus 19.8% in Fleming island.
- Freeport has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 16.1% in Fleming island.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeport at 23.3% compared to 17.1% in Fleming island.
- Freeport has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 31.2% in Fleming island.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fleming island at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Freeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fleming island | Freeport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (127) | 0.3% (2) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (3,358) | 19.9% (135) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (1,017) | 9.2% (62) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.9% (10,407) | 17.4% (118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fleming island vs Freeport
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleming island have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Freeport.
- In Freeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 11.3% in Fleming island.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Freeport at 9.2%, compared to 3.4% in Fleming island.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleming island hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 17.4% in Freeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.