Demographics details for Fleming island, FL vs Dalhart, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fleming island, FL vs Dalhart, TX.

Data Fleming island Dalhart
Population 29,810 8,402
Median Age 47.0 years 34.7 years
Median Income $117,414 $75,000
Married Families 57.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fleming island vs Dalhart

  • In Fleming island, the population is higher at 29,810, compared to 8,402 in Dalhart.
  • Residents in Fleming island have a higher median age of 47.0 years compared to 34.7 years in Dalhart.
  • Fleming island has a higher median income of $117,414 compared to $75,000 in Dalhart.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleming island at 57.0% compared to 46.0% in Dalhart.
  • The poverty level is higher in Dalhart at 12%, compared to 5% in Fleming island.
  • Dalhart has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Fleming island.

Demographics

Demographics Fleming island vs Dalhart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fleming island Dalhart
Black 6 Data is updating
White 75 37
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 10 46
Two or More Races 7 15
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Fleming island vs Dalhart

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fleming island at 6% compared to 0% in Dalhart.
  • Fleming island has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 37% in Dalhart.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fleming island at 2% compared to 0% in Dalhart.
  • Dalhart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 10% in Fleming island.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dalhart at 15%, compared to 7% in Fleming island.
  • In Dalhart, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fleming island.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fleming island Dalhart
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 12.2%
Depression 19.8% 23.5%
Smoking 16.1% 17.8%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 18.9%
Obesity 31.2% 36.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fleming island vs Dalhart

  • In Dalhart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.3% in Fleming island.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Dalhart at 23.5% versus 19.8% in Fleming island.
  • Dalhart has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 16.1% in Fleming island.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Dalhart at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Fleming island.
  • Dalhart has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 31.2% in Fleming island.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fleming island and Dalhart at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fleming island Dalhart
No Schooling 0.4% (127) 4.1% (348)
High School Diploma 11.3% (3,358) 20.8% (1,750)
Less than High School 3.4% (1,017) 19.2% (1,609)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.9% (10,407) 13.0% (1,095)

Education Levels Comparison: Fleming island vs Dalhart

  • In Dalhart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.1% compared to 0.4% in Fleming island.
  • In Dalhart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 11.3% in Fleming island.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dalhart at 19.2%, compared to 3.4% in Fleming island.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fleming island hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 13.0% in Dalhart.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.