Demographics details for Fleming island, FL vs Conneaut, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fleming island, FL vs Conneaut, OH.
Data | Fleming island | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,810 | 12,400 |
Median Age | 47.0 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $117,414 | $55,708 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fleming island vs Conneaut
- In Fleming island, the population is higher at 29,810, compared to 12,400 in Conneaut.
- Residents in Fleming island have a higher median age of 47.0 years compared to 40.0 years in Conneaut.
- Fleming island has a higher median income of $117,414 compared to $55,708 in Conneaut.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleming island at 57.0% compared to 31.0% in Conneaut.
- The poverty level is higher in Conneaut at 10%, compared to 5% in Fleming island.
- Conneaut has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Fleming island.
Demographics
Demographics Fleming island vs Conneaut provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fleming island | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 7 |
White | 75 | 86 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 10 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fleming island vs Conneaut
- In Conneaut, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Fleming island.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Conneaut at 86% compared to 75% in Fleming island.
- The Asian population is larger in Fleming island at 2% compared to 1% in Conneaut.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fleming island at 10% compared to 2% in Conneaut.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fleming island at 7% compared to 4% in Conneaut.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fleming island and Conneaut at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fleming island | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 14.1% |
Depression | 19.8% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 16.1% | 27.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 31.2% | 45.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fleming island vs Conneaut
- In Conneaut, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.3% in Fleming island.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Conneaut at 25.4% versus 19.8% in Fleming island.
- Conneaut has a higher smoking rate at 27.0% compared to 16.1% in Fleming island.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Conneaut at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Fleming island.
- Conneaut has higher obesity rates at 45.5% compared to 31.2% in Fleming island.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Conneaut at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Fleming island.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fleming island | Conneaut |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (127) | 0.4% (50) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (3,358) | 26.8% (3,319) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (1,017) | 17.4% (2,157) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.9% (10,407) | 11.4% (1,411) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fleming island vs Conneaut
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fleming island and Conneaut at 0.4%.
- In Conneaut, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.8% compared to 11.3% in Fleming island.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Conneaut at 17.4%, compared to 3.4% in Fleming island.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleming island hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 11.4% in Conneaut.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.