Demographics details for Fleischmanns, NY vs Sarasota, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fleischmanns, NY vs Sarasota, FL.
Data | Fleischmanns | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
Population | 230 | 57,376 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 49.8 years |
Median Income | $60,417 | $68,870 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Sarasota
- The population in Sarasota is higher at 57,376, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- The median age in Sarasota is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 49.5 years in Fleischmanns.
- Sarasota has a higher median income of $68,870, compared to $60,417 in Fleischmanns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleischmanns at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Sarasota.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fleischmanns and Sarasota at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Fleischmanns is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Sarasota.
Demographics
Demographics Fleischmanns vs Sarasota provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fleischmanns | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 14 |
White | 54 | 60 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 35 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Sarasota
- In Sarasota, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sarasota at 60% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
- In Sarasota, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fleischmanns.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fleischmanns at 35% compared to 15% in Sarasota.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sarasota at 9%, compared to 7% in Fleischmanns.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fleischmanns at 4% compared to 0% in Sarasota.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fleischmanns | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.9% |
Depression | 23.7% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 28.9% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Sarasota
- More residents in Fleischmanns report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Sarasota.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fleischmanns at 23.7% compared to 19.7% in Sarasota.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fleischmanns at 19.5% compared to 18.1% in Sarasota.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Fleischmanns and Sarasota at 17.0%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fleischmanns at 35.0% compared to 28.9% in Sarasota.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Sarasota.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fleischmanns | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.3% (10) | 0.9% (529) |
High School Diploma | 20.0% (46) | 16.9% (9,677) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (50) | 10.9% (6,264) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.0% (85) | 30.5% (17,487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Sarasota
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.9% in Sarasota.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in Sarasota.
- More residents in Fleischmanns have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 10.9% in Sarasota.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 30.5% in Sarasota.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.