Demographics details for Fleischmanns, NY vs Red river, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fleischmanns, NY vs Red river, NM.
Data | Fleischmanns | Red river |
---|---|---|
Population | 230 | 539 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 43.3 years |
Median Income | $60,417 | $49,479 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Red river
- The population in Red river is higher at 539, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- Residents in Fleischmanns have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 43.3 years in Red river.
- Fleischmanns has a higher median income of $60,417 compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleischmanns at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- The poverty level is higher in Red river at 12%, compared to 10% in Fleischmanns.
- Red river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Fleischmanns.
Demographics
Demographics Fleischmanns vs Red river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fleischmanns | Red river |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 54 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 35 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Red river
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fleischmanns and Red river at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red river at 89% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
- Both Fleischmanns and Red river have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fleischmanns at 35% compared to 9% in Red river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fleischmanns at 7% compared to 2% in Red river.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fleischmanns at 4% compared to 0% in Red river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fleischmanns | Red river |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.4% |
Depression | 23.7% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 27.1% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Red river
- More residents in Fleischmanns report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.2% in Red river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fleischmanns at 23.7% compared to 22.0% in Red river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fleischmanns at 19.5% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Red river at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Fleischmanns.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fleischmanns at 35.0% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Red river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fleischmanns | Red river |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.3% (10) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.0% (46) | 5.9% (32) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (50) | 6.7% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.0% (85) | 26.2% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Red river
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- More residents in Fleischmanns have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 6.7% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 26.2% in Red river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.