Demographics details for Fleischmanns, NY vs Maple valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fleischmanns, NY vs Maple valley, WA.

Data Fleischmanns Maple valley
Population 230 28,220
Median Age 49.5 years 36.4 years
Median Income $60,417 $137,595
Married Families 40.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.7

Population Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Maple valley

  • The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
  • Residents in Fleischmanns have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $60,417 in Fleischmanns.
  • In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 40.0% in Fleischmanns.
  • Fleischmanns has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.4% in Fleischmanns.

Demographics

Demographics Fleischmanns vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fleischmanns Maple valley
Black Data is updating 2
White 54 74
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic 35 5
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian 4 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Maple valley at 74% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
  • In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Fleischmanns.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fleischmanns at 35% compared to 5% in Maple valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 7% in Fleischmanns.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fleischmanns at 4% compared to 0% in Maple valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fleischmanns Maple valley
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 8.6%
Depression 23.7% 25.8%
Smoking 19.5% 9.4%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 19.6%
Obesity 35.0% 24.3%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Maple valley

  • More residents in Fleischmanns report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 23.7% in Fleischmanns.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fleischmanns at 19.5% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Fleischmanns.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fleischmanns at 35.0% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fleischmanns Maple valley
No Schooling 4.3% (10) 0.4% (103)
High School Diploma 20.0% (46) 10.2% (2,878)
Less than High School 21.7% (50) 3.1% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.0% (85) 28.5% (8,032)

Education Levels Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Maple valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.4% in Maple valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • More residents in Fleischmanns have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 28.5% in Maple valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.