Demographics details for Fleischmanns, NY vs Holiday, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fleischmanns, NY vs Holiday, FL.
| Data | Fleischmanns | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 230 | 21,495 |
| Median Age | 49.5 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,417 | $40,852 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Holiday
- The population in Holiday is higher at 21,495, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- Residents in Fleischmanns have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 43.9 years in Holiday.
- Fleischmanns has a higher median income of $60,417 compared to $40,852 in Holiday.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleischmanns at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in Holiday.
- The poverty level is higher in Holiday at 13%, compared to 10% in Fleischmanns.
- The unemployment rate in Fleischmanns is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Holiday.
Demographics
Demographics Fleischmanns vs Holiday provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fleischmanns | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 54 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 35 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Holiday
- In Holiday, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Holiday at 61% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
- In Holiday, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fleischmanns.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fleischmanns at 35% compared to 18% in Holiday.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holiday at 11%, compared to 7% in Fleischmanns.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fleischmanns at 4% compared to 0% in Holiday.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fleischmanns | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 27.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Holiday
- In Holiday, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.6% in Fleischmanns.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Holiday at 24.5% versus 23.7% in Fleischmanns.
- Holiday has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 19.5% in Fleischmanns.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fleischmanns at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Holiday.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fleischmanns at 35.0% compared to 33.6% in Holiday.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Holiday.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fleischmanns | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.3% (10) | 1.0% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (46) | 34.2% (7,351) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (50) | 15.3% (3,281) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.0% (85) | 8.5% (1,817) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Holiday
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 1.0% in Holiday.
- In Holiday, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 20.0% in Fleischmanns.
- More residents in Fleischmanns have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 15.3% in Holiday.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 8.5% in Holiday.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.