Demographics details for Fleischmanns, NY vs Colbert, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fleischmanns, NY vs Colbert, OK.
| Data | Fleischmanns | Colbert |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 230 | 1,074 |
| Median Age | 49.5 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,417 | $53,600 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Colbert
- The population in Colbert is higher at 1,074, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- Residents in Fleischmanns have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 43.9 years in Colbert.
- Fleischmanns has a higher median income of $60,417 compared to $53,600 in Colbert.
- In Colbert, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Fleischmanns.
- The poverty level is higher in Colbert at 15%, compared to 10% in Fleischmanns.
- Colbert has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Fleischmanns.
Demographics
Demographics Fleischmanns vs Colbert provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fleischmanns | Colbert |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 12 |
| White | 54 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 35 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | 4 | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Colbert
- In Colbert, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Colbert at 66% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
- Both Fleischmanns and Colbert have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fleischmanns at 35% compared to 4% in Colbert.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Colbert at 8%, compared to 7% in Fleischmanns.
- In Colbert, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 4% in Fleischmanns.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fleischmanns | Colbert |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 43.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Colbert
- In Colbert, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.6% in Fleischmanns.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Colbert at 25.5% versus 23.7% in Fleischmanns.
- Colbert has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 19.5% in Fleischmanns.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fleischmanns at 17.0% compared to 14.3% in Colbert.
- Colbert has higher obesity rates at 43.2% compared to 35.0% in Fleischmanns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Colbert at 26.0% compared to 24.0% in Fleischmanns.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fleischmanns | Colbert |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.3% (10) | 0.5% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (46) | 33.7% (362) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (50) | 31.4% (337) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.0% (85) | 16.8% (180) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fleischmanns vs Colbert
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.5% in Colbert.
- In Colbert, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 20.0% in Fleischmanns.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Colbert at 31.4%, compared to 21.7% in Fleischmanns.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fleischmanns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 16.8% in Colbert.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.