Demographics details for Fitzgerald, GA vs Waterford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fitzgerald, GA vs Waterford, CT.
| Data | Fitzgerald | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,900 | 3,276 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $32,500 | $74,701 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Waterford
- In Fitzgerald, the population is higher at 8,900, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- The median age in Waterford is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 35.3 years in Fitzgerald.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701, compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
- In Waterford, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 26.0% in Fitzgerald.
- Fitzgerald has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The unemployment rate in Fitzgerald is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Fitzgerald vs Waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fitzgerald | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 4 |
| White | 42 | 80 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Waterford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fitzgerald at 55% compared to 4% in Waterford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterford at 80% compared to 42% in Fitzgerald.
- In Waterford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Fitzgerald.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterford at 6%, compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fitzgerald and Waterford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fitzgerald | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Waterford
- More residents in Fitzgerald report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.7% in Waterford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterford at 24.0% versus 22.4% in Fitzgerald.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fitzgerald at 22.9% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 13.4% in Fitzgerald.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fitzgerald at 45.0% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Fitzgerald.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fitzgerald | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (41) | 0.5% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 32.9% (2,930) | 22.6% (739) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (992) | 5.9% (193) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (828) | 17.8% (582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Waterford
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fitzgerald and Waterford at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 22.6% in Waterford.
- More residents in Fitzgerald have less than a high school education at 11.1% compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 9.3% in Fitzgerald.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.