Demographics details for Fitzgerald, GA vs Sparks, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fitzgerald, GA vs Sparks, NV.
| Data | Fitzgerald | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,900 | 109,226 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $32,500 | $82,938 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Sparks
- The population in Sparks is higher at 109,226, compared to 8,900 in Fitzgerald.
- The median age in Sparks is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.3 years in Fitzgerald.
- Sparks has a higher median income of $82,938, compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
- In Sparks, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 26.0% in Fitzgerald.
- Fitzgerald has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Sparks.
- Sparks has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Fitzgerald.
Demographics
Demographics Fitzgerald vs Sparks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fitzgerald | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 2 |
| White | 42 | 43 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Sparks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fitzgerald at 55% compared to 2% in Sparks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sparks at 43% compared to 42% in Fitzgerald.
- In Sparks, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Fitzgerald.
- Sparks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sparks at 15%, compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- In Sparks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fitzgerald.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fitzgerald | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Sparks
- More residents in Fitzgerald report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.3% in Sparks.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fitzgerald at 22.4% compared to 19.9% in Sparks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fitzgerald at 22.9% compared to 17.0% in Sparks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sparks at 17.9% compared to 13.4% in Fitzgerald.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fitzgerald at 45.0% compared to 28.6% in Sparks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fitzgerald at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Sparks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fitzgerald | Sparks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (41) | 1.4% (1,548) |
| High School Diploma | 32.9% (2,930) | 14.7% (16,026) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (992) | 18.1% (19,717) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (828) | 16.9% (18,457) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Sparks
- In Sparks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Fitzgerald.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 14.7% in Sparks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sparks at 18.1%, compared to 11.1% in Fitzgerald.
- In Sparks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 9.3% in Fitzgerald.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.