Demographics details for Fitzgerald, GA vs Rosholt, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fitzgerald, GA vs Rosholt, WI.
| Data | Fitzgerald | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,900 | 470 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $32,500 | $55,313 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Rosholt
- In Fitzgerald, the population is higher at 8,900, compared to 470 in Rosholt.
- The median age in Rosholt is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 35.3 years in Fitzgerald.
- Rosholt has a higher median income of $55,313, compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
- In Rosholt, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 26.0% in Fitzgerald.
- Fitzgerald has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Rosholt.
- The unemployment rate in Fitzgerald is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Rosholt.
Demographics
Demographics Fitzgerald vs Rosholt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fitzgerald | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | Data is updating |
| White | 42 | 94 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Rosholt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fitzgerald at 55% compared to 0% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rosholt at 94% compared to 42% in Fitzgerald.
- The Asian population is larger in Fitzgerald at 1% compared to 0% in Rosholt.
- Rosholt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rosholt at 3%, compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fitzgerald and Rosholt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fitzgerald | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 24.6% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 31.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Rosholt
- More residents in Fitzgerald report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.1% in Rosholt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rosholt at 23.2% versus 22.4% in Fitzgerald.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fitzgerald at 22.9% compared to 14.0% in Rosholt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rosholt at 24.6% compared to 13.4% in Fitzgerald.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fitzgerald at 45.0% compared to 31.4% in Rosholt.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fitzgerald and Rosholt at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fitzgerald | Rosholt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (41) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 32.9% (2,930) | 28.3% (133) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (992) | 15.3% (72) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (828) | 8.7% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Rosholt
- A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Rosholt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 28.3% in Rosholt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosholt at 15.3%, compared to 11.1% in Fitzgerald.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 8.7% in Rosholt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.