Demographics details for Fitzgerald, GA vs Mount hermon, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fitzgerald, GA vs Mount hermon, LA.

Data Fitzgerald Mount hermon
Population 8,900 118
Median Age 35.3 years 43.0 years
Median Income $32,500 $49,500
Married Families 26.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 18% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Mount hermon

  • In Fitzgerald, the population is higher at 8,900, compared to 118 in Mount hermon.
  • The median age in Mount hermon is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 35.3 years in Fitzgerald.
  • Mount hermon has a higher median income of $49,500, compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
  • In Mount hermon, the percentage of married families is higher at 27.0%, compared to 26.0% in Fitzgerald.
  • Fitzgerald has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Mount hermon.
  • Mount hermon has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Fitzgerald.

Demographics

Demographics Fitzgerald vs Mount hermon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fitzgerald Mount hermon
Black 55 Data is updating
White 42 97
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 1 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Mount hermon

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fitzgerald at 55% compared to 0% in Mount hermon.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount hermon at 97% compared to 42% in Fitzgerald.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fitzgerald at 1% compared to 0% in Mount hermon.
  • Mount hermon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
  • Both Fitzgerald and Mount hermon have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fitzgerald and Mount hermon at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fitzgerald Mount hermon
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 15.1% Data is updating%
Depression 22.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.9% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 13.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 45.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 14.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Mount hermon

  • More residents in Fitzgerald report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fitzgerald at 22.4% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fitzgerald at 22.9% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fitzgerald at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fitzgerald at 45.0% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fitzgerald at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fitzgerald Mount hermon
No Schooling 0.5% (41) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 32.9% (2,930) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.1% (992) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (828) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Fitzgerald vs Mount hermon

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • More residents in Fitzgerald have less than a high school education at 11.1% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fitzgerald hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.