Demographics details for Fishkill, NY vs Fowler, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishkill, NY vs Fowler, KS.
Data | Fishkill | Fowler |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,156 | 513 |
Median Age | 47.1 years | 39.8 years |
Median Income | $94,205 | $45,402 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fishkill vs Fowler
- In Fishkill, the population is higher at 2,156, compared to 513 in Fowler.
- Residents in Fishkill have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 39.8 years in Fowler.
- Fishkill has a higher median income of $94,205 compared to $45,402 in Fowler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishkill at 44.0% compared to 24.0% in Fowler.
- The poverty level is higher in Fowler at 13%, compared to 5% in Fishkill.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fishkill and Fowler at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Fishkill vs Fowler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fishkill | Fowler |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | Data is updating |
White | 70 | 71 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 11 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | 2 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Fishkill vs Fowler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fishkill at 7% compared to 0% in Fowler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fowler at 71% compared to 70% in Fishkill.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishkill at 2% compared to 0% in Fowler.
- Fowler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 11% in Fishkill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fishkill at 8% compared to 7% in Fowler.
- In Fowler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Fishkill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fishkill | Fowler |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.3% |
Depression | 21.3% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 19.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 29.9% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishkill vs Fowler
- In Fowler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.4% in Fishkill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fishkill at 21.3% compared to 21.2% in Fowler.
- Fowler has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 15.6% in Fishkill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fowler at 18.8% compared to 16.5% in Fishkill.
- Fowler has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 29.9% in Fishkill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fowler at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Fishkill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fishkill | Fowler |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (349) | 9.0% (46) |
Less than High School | 15.4% (331) | 13.5% (69) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.2% (824) | 20.9% (107) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishkill vs Fowler
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fishkill and Fowler at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishkill hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 9.0% in Fowler.
- More residents in Fishkill have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 13.5% in Fowler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishkill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 20.9% in Fowler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.