Demographics details for Fishkill, NY vs Flemington, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishkill, NY vs Flemington, NJ.
| Data | Fishkill | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,156 | 4,906 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $94,205 | $85,306 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fishkill vs Flemington
- The population in Flemington is higher at 4,906, compared to 2,156 in Fishkill.
- Residents in Fishkill have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 32.4 years in Flemington.
- Fishkill has a higher median income of $94,205 compared to $85,306 in Flemington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishkill at 44.0% compared to 41.0% in Flemington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fishkill and Flemington at 5%.
- Flemington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Fishkill.
Demographics
Demographics Fishkill vs Flemington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fishkill | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 6 |
| White | 70 | 58 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fishkill vs Flemington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fishkill at 7% compared to 6% in Flemington.
- Fishkill has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 58% in Flemington.
- In Flemington, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Fishkill.
- Flemington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 11% in Fishkill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fishkill at 8% compared to 6% in Flemington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fishkill at 2% compared to 0% in Flemington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fishkill | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishkill vs Flemington
- In Flemington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 14.4% in Fishkill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flemington at 23.8% versus 21.3% in Fishkill.
- Flemington has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Fishkill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Flemington at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Fishkill.
- Flemington has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 29.9% in Fishkill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fishkill at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Flemington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fishkill | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.6% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (349) | 16.8% (825) |
| Less than High School | 15.4% (331) | 23.5% (1,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.2% (824) | 22.8% (1,117) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishkill vs Flemington
- In Flemington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Fishkill.
- In Flemington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 16.2% in Fishkill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flemington at 23.5%, compared to 15.4% in Fishkill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishkill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 22.8% in Flemington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.