Demographics details for Fishkill, NY vs Chalfont, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishkill, NY vs Chalfont, PA.
| Data | Fishkill | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,156 | 4,283 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $94,205 | $118,871 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Fishkill vs Chalfont
- The population in Chalfont is higher at 4,283, compared to 2,156 in Fishkill.
- Residents in Fishkill have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 41.7 years in Chalfont.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871, compared to $94,205 in Fishkill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishkill at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Chalfont.
- Fishkill has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- Chalfont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Fishkill.
Demographics
Demographics Fishkill vs Chalfont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fishkill | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fishkill vs Chalfont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fishkill at 7% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chalfont at 88% compared to 70% in Fishkill.
- In Chalfont, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Fishkill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fishkill at 11% compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fishkill at 8% compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fishkill at 2% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fishkill | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 20.5% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishkill vs Chalfont
- More residents in Fishkill report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chalfont at 22.1% versus 21.3% in Fishkill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fishkill at 15.6% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 16.5% in Fishkill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fishkill at 29.9% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fishkill at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fishkill | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (349) | 11.2% (479) |
| Less than High School | 15.4% (331) | 2.3% (98) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.2% (824) | 42.7% (1,830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishkill vs Chalfont
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fishkill and Chalfont at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishkill hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- More residents in Fishkill have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- In Chalfont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 38.2% in Fishkill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.