Demographics details for Fishing creek, MD vs Starkville, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fishing creek, MD vs Starkville, MS.

Data Fishing creek Starkville
Population 235 24,168
Median Age 55.9 years 27.0 years
Median Income $76,250 $36,076
Married Families 58.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 27%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fishing creek vs Starkville

  • The population in Starkville is higher at 24,168, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • Residents in Fishing creek have a higher median age of 55.9 years compared to 27.0 years in Starkville.
  • Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250 compared to $36,076 in Starkville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishing creek at 58.0% compared to 30.0% in Starkville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Starkville at 27%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Fishing creek and Starkville at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Fishing creek vs Starkville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fishing creek Starkville
Black Data is updating 34
White 100 58
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fishing creek vs Starkville

  • In Starkville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Fishing creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 58% in Starkville.
  • In Starkville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Starkville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Starkville at 2%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishing creek and Starkville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fishing creek Starkville
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 12.5%
Depression 21.2% 20.3%
Smoking 15.1% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 13.8%
Obesity 33.1% 44.8%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fishing creek vs Starkville

  • In Starkville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fishing creek at 21.2% compared to 20.3% in Starkville.
  • Starkville has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fishing creek at 16.8% compared to 13.8% in Starkville.
  • Starkville has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 11.0% in Starkville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fishing creek Starkville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.3% (321)
High School Diploma 34.5% (81) 9.4% (2,276)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.8% (1,655)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (38) 26.3% (6,345)

Education Levels Comparison: Fishing creek vs Starkville

  • In Starkville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a high school diploma at 34.5% compared to 9.4% in Starkville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Starkville at 6.8%, compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • In Starkville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 16.2% in Fishing creek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.