Demographics details for Fishing creek, MD vs Rockland, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fishing creek, MD vs Rockland, MA.

Data Fishing creek Rockland
Population 235 17,489
Median Age 55.9 years 41.5 years
Median Income $76,250 $84,500
Married Families 58.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Fishing creek vs Rockland

  • The population in Rockland is higher at 17,489, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • Residents in Fishing creek have a higher median age of 55.9 years compared to 41.5 years in Rockland.
  • Rockland has a higher median income of $84,500, compared to $76,250 in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishing creek at 58.0% compared to 49.0% in Rockland.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rockland at 5%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Rockland has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Fishing creek.

Demographics

Demographics Fishing creek vs Rockland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fishing creek Rockland
Black Data is updating 2
White 100 86
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 6
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fishing creek vs Rockland

  • In Rockland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Fishing creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 86% in Rockland.
  • In Rockland, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Rockland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockland at 2%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishing creek and Rockland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fishing creek Rockland
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% Data is updating%
Depression 21.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 33.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 28.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fishing creek vs Rockland

  • More residents in Fishing creek report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fishing creek at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fishing creek at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fishing creek at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fishing creek at 33.1% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fishing creek Rockland
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 34.5% (81) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (38) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Fishing creek vs Rockland

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fishing creek and Rockland at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a high school diploma at 34.5% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Rockland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.