Environment details: Fishing creek MD

Air quality:
1.86
Poor air:
55/365
Water Quality:
7/10
 

generally good quality; minimal treatment needed.

Environment details: Pleasant grove UT

Air quality:
2.18
Poor air:
114/365
Water Quality:
6/10
 

acceptable quality, some pollutants observed.

Compare Environment: Fishing creek MD vs Pleasant grove UT

Environmental and Climate Insights

Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.

Metric Fishing creek Pleasant grove
CO2 Emissions 421 496
Water Quality 7/10 6/10
Water Quality Explanation generally good quality; minimal treatment needed. acceptable quality, some pollutants observed.
Median Air Quality 2.0 2.0
Average Air Quality Index 1.86 2.18
Worst AQI 4.0 5.0
Days with Poor AQI 55 114

Environmental Insights Comparison: Fishing creek vs Pleasant grove

  • Water quality is rated higher in Fishing creek at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Pleasant grove.
  • Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
  • Air quality is better in Pleasant grove with an average index of 2.18 compared to 1.86 in Fishing creek.
  • Pleasant grove experiences more days with poor air quality at 114 compared to 55 in Fishing creek.

Overview of the Place

Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.