Environment details: Fishing creek MD
generally good quality; minimal treatment needed.
Environment details: Pleasant grove UT
acceptable quality, some pollutants observed.
Compare Environment: Fishing creek MD vs Pleasant grove UT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Fishing creek | Pleasant grove |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 421 | 496 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | generally good quality; minimal treatment needed. | acceptable quality, some pollutants observed. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.86 | 2.18 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 55 | 114 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Fishing creek vs Pleasant grove
- Water quality is rated higher in Fishing creek at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Pleasant grove.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Pleasant grove with an average index of 2.18 compared to 1.86 in Fishing creek.
- Pleasant grove experiences more days with poor air quality at 114 compared to 55 in Fishing creek.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.