Demographics details for Fishing creek, MD vs Gainesboro, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fishing creek, MD vs Gainesboro, TN.

Data Fishing creek Gainesboro
Population 235 936
Median Age 55.9 years 49.5 years
Median Income $76,250 $37,404
Married Families 58.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Fishing creek vs Gainesboro

  • The population in Gainesboro is higher at 936, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • Residents in Fishing creek have a higher median age of 55.9 years compared to 49.5 years in Gainesboro.
  • Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250 compared to $37,404 in Gainesboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishing creek at 58.0% compared to 41.0% in Gainesboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gainesboro at 13%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Gainesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fishing creek.

Demographics

Demographics Fishing creek vs Gainesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fishing creek Gainesboro
Black Data is updating 4
White 100 85
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fishing creek vs Gainesboro

  • In Gainesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Fishing creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 85% in Gainesboro.
  • Both Fishing creek and Gainesboro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Gainesboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gainesboro at 7%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishing creek and Gainesboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fishing creek Gainesboro
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 15.0%
Depression 21.2% 30.4%
Smoking 15.1% 25.4%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 15.6%
Obesity 33.1% 36.1%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 33.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fishing creek vs Gainesboro

  • In Gainesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gainesboro at 30.4% versus 21.2% in Fishing creek.
  • Gainesboro has a higher smoking rate at 25.4% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fishing creek at 16.8% compared to 15.6% in Gainesboro.
  • Gainesboro has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gainesboro at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Fishing creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fishing creek Gainesboro
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (3)
High School Diploma 34.5% (81) 32.5% (304)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 34.2% (320)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (38) 10.6% (99)

Education Levels Comparison: Fishing creek vs Gainesboro

  • In Gainesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a high school diploma at 34.5% compared to 32.5% in Gainesboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gainesboro at 34.2%, compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 10.6% in Gainesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.