Demographics details for Fishing creek, MD vs El monte, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fishing creek, MD vs El monte, CA.

Data Fishing creek El monte
Population 235 105,312
Median Age 55.9 years 37.4 years
Median Income $76,250 $59,929
Married Families 58.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.6

Population Comparison: Fishing creek vs El monte

  • The population in El monte is higher at 105,312, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • Residents in Fishing creek have a higher median age of 55.9 years compared to 37.4 years in El monte.
  • Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250 compared to $59,929 in El monte.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishing creek at 58.0% compared to 35.0% in El monte.
  • The poverty level is higher in El monte at 12%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • El monte has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Fishing creek.

Demographics

Demographics Fishing creek vs El monte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fishing creek El monte
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 -19
Asian Data is updating 30
Hispanic Data is updating 68
Two or More Races Data is updating 17
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Fishing creek vs El monte

  • In El monte, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Fishing creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to -19% in El monte.
  • In El monte, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 0% in Fishing creek.
  • El monte has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in El monte at 17%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • In El monte, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fishing creek El monte
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 14.0%
Depression 21.2% 14.9%
Smoking 15.1% 13.9%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 12.7%
Obesity 33.1% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fishing creek vs El monte

  • In El monte, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fishing creek at 21.2% compared to 14.9% in El monte.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fishing creek at 15.1% compared to 13.9% in El monte.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fishing creek at 16.8% compared to 12.7% in El monte.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fishing creek at 33.1% compared to 29.1% in El monte.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fishing creek at 28.0% compared to 11.0% in El monte.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fishing creek El monte
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.1% (6,387)
High School Diploma 34.5% (81) 18.7% (19,723)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 42.6% (44,822)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (38) 9.5% (10,027)

Education Levels Comparison: Fishing creek vs El monte

  • In El monte, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.1% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a high school diploma at 34.5% compared to 18.7% in El monte.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in El monte at 42.6%, compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 9.5% in El monte.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.