Demographics details for Fishing creek, MD vs De soto, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fishing creek, MD vs De soto, IL.

Data Fishing creek De soto
Population 235 1,396
Median Age 55.9 years 35.9 years
Median Income $76,250 $53,188
Married Families 58.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Fishing creek vs De soto

  • The population in De soto is higher at 1,396, compared to 235 in Fishing creek.
  • Residents in Fishing creek have a higher median age of 55.9 years compared to 35.9 years in De soto.
  • Fishing creek has a higher median income of $76,250 compared to $53,188 in De soto.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishing creek at 58.0% compared to 35.0% in De soto.
  • The poverty level is higher in De soto at 12%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • De soto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Fishing creek.

Demographics

Demographics Fishing creek vs De soto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fishing creek De soto
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 86
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fishing creek vs De soto

  • In De soto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • Fishing creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 86% in De soto.
  • In De soto, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fishing creek.
  • De soto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in De soto at 8%, compared to 0% in Fishing creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishing creek and De soto at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fishing creek De soto
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 12.9%
Depression 21.2% 24.7%
Smoking 15.1% 20.5%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 17.7%
Obesity 33.1% 35.7%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 33.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fishing creek vs De soto

  • In De soto, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.3% in Fishing creek.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in De soto at 24.7% versus 21.2% in Fishing creek.
  • De soto has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 15.1% in Fishing creek.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in De soto at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Fishing creek.
  • De soto has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 33.1% in Fishing creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in De soto at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Fishing creek.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fishing creek De soto
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (9)
High School Diploma 34.5% (81) 19.2% (268)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.8% (249)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (38) 17.0% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Fishing creek vs De soto

  • In De soto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishing creek hold a high school diploma at 34.5% compared to 19.2% in De soto.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in De soto at 17.8%, compared to 0.0% in Fishing creek.
  • In De soto, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Fishing creek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.