Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Surprise, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Surprise, AZ.
| Data | Fishers | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,966 | 154,198 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $126,548 | $87,756 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs Surprise
- The population in Surprise is higher at 154,198, compared to 101,966 in Fishers.
- The median age in Surprise is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $87,756 in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 44.0% in Surprise.
- The poverty level is higher in Surprise at 13%, compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Surprise has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Fishers.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs Surprise provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fishers | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 5 |
| White | 80 | 63 |
| Asian | 8 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Surprise
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fishers and Surprise at 5%.
- Fishers has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 63% in Surprise.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 2% in Surprise.
- Surprise has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Surprise at 9%, compared to 4% in Fishers.
- In Surprise, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fishers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fishers | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 27.8% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Surprise
- In Surprise, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fishers at 22.2% compared to 20.1% in Surprise.
- Surprise has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Surprise has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Surprise at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fishers | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 0.5% (754) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 13.7% (21,050) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 7.6% (11,792) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 19.9% (30,735) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Surprise
- In Surprise, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- In Surprise, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Surprise at 7.6%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 19.9% in Surprise.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.