Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs San ramon, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs San ramon, CA.
Data | Fishers | San ramon |
---|---|---|
Population | 101,966 | 85,953 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $126,548 | $190,829 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 3% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs San ramon
- In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 85,953 in San ramon.
- The median age in San ramon is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- San ramon has a higher median income of $190,829, compared to $126,548 in Fishers.
- In San ramon, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 47.0% in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 3% in San ramon.
- San ramon has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Fishers.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs San ramon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fishers | San ramon |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 3 |
White | 80 | 33 |
Asian | 8 | 48 |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs San ramon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fishers at 5% compared to 3% in San ramon.
- Fishers has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 33% in San ramon.
- In San ramon, the Asian population stands at 48%, greater than 8% in Fishers.
- San ramon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San ramon at 8%, compared to 4% in Fishers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishers and San ramon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fishers | San ramon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 6.7% |
Depression | 22.2% | 14.9% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 6.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 27.8% | 18.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs San ramon
- More residents in Fishers report poor mental health at 12.5% compared to 11.6% in San ramon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fishers at 22.2% compared to 14.9% in San ramon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fishers at 9.4% compared to 6.3% in San ramon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fishers at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in San ramon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fishers at 27.8% compared to 18.9% in San ramon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fishers at 7.0% compared to 6.0% in San ramon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fishers | San ramon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 0.7% (596) |
High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 5.2% (4,459) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 3.2% (2,726) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 46.6% (40,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs San ramon
- In San ramon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a high school diploma at 6.5% compared to 5.2% in San ramon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San ramon at 3.2%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- In San ramon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.6% compared to 41.2% in Fishers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.