Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Penelope, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Penelope, TX.
| Data | Fishers | Penelope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,966 | 185 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $126,548 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 59.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs Penelope
- In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 185 in Penelope.
- The median age in Penelope is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $55,000 in Penelope.
- In Penelope, the percentage of married families is higher at 59.0%, compared to 47.0% in Fishers.
- The poverty level is higher in Penelope at 10%, compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Penelope has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Fishers.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs Penelope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fishers | Penelope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 44 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Penelope
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fishers at 5% compared to 0% in Penelope.
- Fishers has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 44% in Penelope.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 1% in Penelope.
- Penelope has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Penelope at 16%, compared to 4% in Fishers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishers and Penelope at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fishers | Penelope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 27.8% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Penelope
- In Penelope, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Penelope at 24.8% versus 22.2% in Fishers.
- Penelope has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Penelope at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Penelope has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Penelope at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fishers | Penelope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 10.3% (19) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 25.4% (47) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 36.8% (68) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 18.4% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Penelope
- In Penelope, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 10.3% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- In Penelope, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Penelope at 36.8%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 18.4% in Penelope.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.