Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Mccurtain, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Mccurtain, OK.
| Data | Fishers | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,966 | 30,931 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $126,548 | $47,046 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs Mccurtain
- In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 30,931 in Mccurtain.
- The median age in Mccurtain is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 37.0% in Mccurtain.
- The poverty level is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Mccurtain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Fishers.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fishers | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 8 |
| White | 80 | 58 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 14 |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 58% in Mccurtain.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 1% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 4% in Fishers.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in Fishers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fishers | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 27.8% | 46.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 22.2% in Fishers.
- Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fishers at 17.0% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fishers | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 0.7% (209) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 23.5% (7,268) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 17.2% (5,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 10.3% (3,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccurtain at 17.2%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 10.3% in Mccurtain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.