Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Manns choice, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Manns choice, PA.
Data | Fishers | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
Population | 101,966 | 312 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $126,548 | $47,500 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs Manns choice
- In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 312 in Manns choice.
- The median age is the same in both Fishers and Manns choice at 37.1 years.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $47,500 in Manns choice.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 34.0% in Manns choice.
- Fishers has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The unemployment rate in Fishers is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Manns choice.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs Manns choice provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fishers | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 80 | 97 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Manns choice
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fishers at 5% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manns choice at 97% compared to 80% in Fishers.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fishers at 3% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fishers at 4% compared to 3% in Manns choice.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishers and Manns choice at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fishers | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 12.2% |
Depression | 22.2% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 21.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 27.8% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Manns choice at 24.1% versus 22.2% in Fishers.
- Manns choice has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manns choice at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Manns choice has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Manns choice at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fishers | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 1.0% (3) |
High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 31.4% (98) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 11.5% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 1.0% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- In Manns choice, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manns choice at 11.5%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 1.0% in Manns choice.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.