Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Forest city, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Forest city, NC.

Data Fishers Forest city
Population 101,966 7,358
Median Age 37.1 years 32.8 years
Median Income $126,548 $35,232
Married Families 47.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 5% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Fishers vs Forest city

  • In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 7,358 in Forest city.
  • Residents in Fishers have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 32.8 years in Forest city.
  • Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $35,232 in Forest city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 21.0% in Forest city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forest city at 11%, compared to 5% in Fishers.
  • Forest city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fishers.

Demographics

Demographics Fishers vs Forest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fishers Forest city
Black 5 28
White 80 57
Asian 8 2
Hispanic 3 8
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 5% in Fishers.
  • Fishers has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 57% in Forest city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 2% in Forest city.
  • Forest city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest city at 5%, compared to 4% in Fishers.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishers and Forest city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fishers Forest city
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 14.4%
Depression 22.2% 24.4%
Smoking 9.4% 22.1%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 15.2%
Obesity 27.8% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Forest city at 24.4% versus 22.2% in Fishers.
  • Forest city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fishers at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Forest city.
  • Forest city has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest city at 23.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fishers Forest city
No Schooling 0.4% (418) 0.9% (63)
High School Diploma 6.5% (6,652) 15.5% (1,140)
Less than High School 2.0% (2,037) 13.0% (956)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 41.2% (42,051) 10.7% (785)

Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
  • In Forest city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest city at 13.0%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 10.7% in Forest city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.