Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Faribault, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Faribault, MN.
| Data | Fishers | Faribault |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 101,966 | 24,518 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $126,548 | $58,881 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs Faribault
- In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 24,518 in Faribault.
- The median age in Faribault is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $58,881 in Faribault.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 33.0% in Faribault.
- The poverty level is higher in Faribault at 8%, compared to 5% in Fishers.
- The unemployment rate in Fishers is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Faribault.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs Faribault provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fishers | Faribault |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 15 |
| White | 80 | 64 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Faribault
- In Faribault, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 64% in Faribault.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 1% in Faribault.
- Faribault has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Faribault at 5%, compared to 4% in Fishers.
- In Faribault, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fishers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fishers | Faribault |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 27.8% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Faribault
- In Faribault, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fishers at 22.2% compared to 21.0% in Faribault.
- Faribault has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Faribault at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Faribault has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Faribault at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fishers | Faribault |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 2.1% (513) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 22.3% (5,456) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 14.1% (3,450) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 12.2% (2,982) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Faribault
- In Faribault, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- In Faribault, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Faribault at 14.1%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 12.2% in Faribault.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.