Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Ashland, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Ashland, NE.
Data | Fishers | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Population | 101,966 | 3,262 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $126,548 | $78,966 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fishers vs Ashland
- In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 3,262 in Ashland.
- Residents in Fishers have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Ashland.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $78,966 in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 43.0% in Ashland.
- Fishers has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Ashland.
- The unemployment rate in Fishers is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Fishers vs Ashland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fishers | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 80 | 92 |
Asian | 8 | 3 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fishers at 5% compared to 0% in Ashland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashland at 92% compared to 80% in Fishers.
- The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 3% in Ashland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fishers at 3% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fishers at 4% compared to 3% in Ashland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fishers and Ashland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fishers | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 9.5% |
Depression | 22.2% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 22.4% |
Obesity | 27.8% | 36.2% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fishers at 22.2% compared to 17.9% in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashland at 22.4% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Ashland has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ashland at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fishers | Ashland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (418) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 6.5% (6,652) | 15.1% (492) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (2,037) | 9.0% (293) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (42,051) | 20.7% (675) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Ashland.
- In Ashland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashland at 9.0%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 20.7% in Ashland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.