Demographics details for Firth, NE vs Kannapolis, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Firth, NE vs Kannapolis, NC.
| Data | Firth | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 654 | 55,448 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $86,042 | $66,487 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Firth vs Kannapolis
- The population in Kannapolis is higher at 55,448, compared to 654 in Firth.
- The median age is the same in both Firth and Kannapolis at 37.0 years.
- Firth has a higher median income of $86,042 compared to $66,487 in Kannapolis.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Firth at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Kannapolis.
- The poverty level is higher in Kannapolis at 13%, compared to 5% in Firth.
- Kannapolis has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Firth.
Demographics
Demographics Firth vs Kannapolis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Firth | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 22 |
| White | 85 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Firth vs Kannapolis
- In Kannapolis, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Firth.
- Firth has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 57% in Kannapolis.
- In Kannapolis, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Firth.
- Kannapolis has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Firth.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kannapolis at 7%, compared to 6% in Firth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Firth and Kannapolis at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Firth | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.0% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 18.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.1% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Firth vs Kannapolis
- In Kannapolis, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.3% in Firth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kannapolis at 24.6% versus 17.9% in Firth.
- Kannapolis has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 11.4% in Firth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Firth at 24.1% compared to 16.7% in Kannapolis.
- Kannapolis has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.5% in Firth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kannapolis at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Firth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Firth | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (21) | 1.0% (548) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (60) | 15.7% (8,714) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (66) | 14.2% (7,881) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (82) | 17.6% (9,747) |
Education Levels Comparison: Firth vs Kannapolis
- A higher percentage of residents in Firth have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.0% in Kannapolis.
- In Kannapolis, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 9.2% in Firth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kannapolis at 14.2%, compared to 10.1% in Firth.
- In Kannapolis, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 12.5% in Firth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.