Demographics details for Firth, NE vs Harker heights, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Firth, NE vs Harker heights, TX.
| Data | Firth | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 654 | 34,102 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $86,042 | $72,258 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Firth vs Harker heights
- The population in Harker heights is higher at 34,102, compared to 654 in Firth.
- Residents in Firth have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
- Firth has a higher median income of $86,042 compared to $72,258 in Harker heights.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Firth at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
- The poverty level is higher in Harker heights at 9%, compared to 5% in Firth.
- Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Firth.
Demographics
Demographics Firth vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Firth | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 28 |
| White | 85 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Firth vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 0% in Firth.
- Firth has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
- In Harker heights, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Firth.
- Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 8% in Firth.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harker heights at 11%, compared to 6% in Firth.
- In Harker heights, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Firth.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Firth | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.1% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Firth vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 12.3% in Firth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 17.9% in Firth.
- Harker heights has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 11.4% in Firth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Firth at 24.1% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
- Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 31.5% in Firth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harker heights at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Firth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Firth | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (21) | 1.3% (448) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (60) | 11.6% (3,958) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (66) | 10.3% (3,509) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (82) | 18.8% (6,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Firth vs Harker heights
- A higher percentage of residents in Firth have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.3% in Harker heights.
- In Harker heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.6% compared to 9.2% in Firth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harker heights at 10.3%, compared to 10.1% in Firth.
- In Harker heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 12.5% in Firth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.