Demographics details for Firth, NE vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Firth, NE vs Fort valley, GA.
| Data | Firth | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 654 | 8,838 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 30.6 years |
| Median Income | $86,042 | $31,807 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 18.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Firth vs Fort valley
- The population in Fort valley is higher at 8,838, compared to 654 in Firth.
- Residents in Firth have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Firth has a higher median income of $86,042 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Firth at 38.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 5% in Firth.
- Fort valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Firth.
Demographics
Demographics Firth vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Firth | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 70 |
| White | 85 | 18 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Firth vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Firth.
- Firth has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Firth at 1% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Firth and Fort valley at 8%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Firth at 6% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Firth and Fort valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Firth | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.3% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.0% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.1% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Firth vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.3% in Firth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort valley at 19.5% versus 17.9% in Firth.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 11.4% in Firth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Firth at 24.1% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 31.5% in Firth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Firth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Firth | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (21) | 3.0% (267) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (60) | 13.9% (1,226) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (66) | 17.3% (1,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (82) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Firth vs Fort valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Firth have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Fort valley.
- In Fort valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 9.2% in Firth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 10.1% in Firth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Firth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.