Demographics details for Findlay, OH vs Yakima, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Findlay, OH vs Yakima, WA.
| Data | Findlay | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,249 | 97,012 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,986 | $55,734 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Findlay vs Yakima
- The population in Yakima is higher at 97,012, compared to 40,249 in Findlay.
- Residents in Findlay have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher median income of $55,734, compared to $54,986 in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Findlay at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 10% in Findlay.
- Yakima has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.7% in Findlay.
Demographics
Demographics Findlay vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Findlay | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 34 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Findlay vs Yakima
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Findlay at 3% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- Findlay has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- The Asian population is larger in Findlay at 2% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 8% in Findlay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 4% in Findlay.
- In Yakima, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Findlay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Findlay | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Findlay vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.4% in Findlay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yakima at 23.6% versus 22.5% in Findlay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Findlay at 19.5% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
- Binge drinking is more common in Findlay at 17.5% compared to 15.4% in Yakima.
- Yakima has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 37.6% in Findlay.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yakima at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Findlay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Findlay | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (105) | 1.8% (1,748) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (8,536) | 13.4% (12,983) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (4,003) | 27.9% (27,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (7,904) | 12.1% (11,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Findlay vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 9.9% in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Findlay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 12.1% in Yakima.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.